| 
                        Product Details:
                                                     
 
 | 
| Product Name: | Cream Jar | Material: | PET | 
|---|---|---|---|
| Color: | Customized | Size: | 5G-100G | 
| MOQ: | 10000pcs | ||
| Highlight: | Small Size Plastic Cream Jar,5G-100G Size Range Cosmetic Cream Jar,MOQ 10000pcs Skincare Cream Jar | ||
The choice of container depends heavily on the product's viscosity, desired user experience, and preservation needs.
The classic container, as previously discussed.
Mechanism: Open mouth, accessed by dipping fingers or a spatula.
Best For: Thick creams, balms, butters, masks, and products where a luxurious, pampering experience is key.
Pros: Cost-effective, great branding space, perceived as premium.
Cons: Least hygienic, exposes all product to air, difficult to fully empty.
Common Materials: PP (translucent), PET (clear), Acrylic (high-gloss).
A flexible container with a nozzle, dispensed by squeezing.
Mechanism: Product is squeezed out through a capped nozzle.
Best For: Lotions, gels, ointments, and lighter creams. Excellent for targeted application.
Pros: Hygienic (no air or bacteria gets back in), easy to control dosage, portable, 99% evacuable.
Cons: Can be difficult to fully control the amount squeezed; can "worm" (suck air back in) if not sealed well.
Common Materials: Laminated plastic (for stability and barrier properties).
The premium standard for product preservation. They use a vacuum mechanism to dispense product without letting air in.
Mechanism: A piston at the bottom rises as the pump is pressed, pushing the cream up. No dip tube is needed.
Best For: High-end skincare with active ingredients (Vitamin C, retinol, peptides), formulations prone to contamination.
Pros: Most hygienic and preservative. Protects sensitive ingredients from air and light. Dispenses a precise dose. Elegant and modern.
Cons: More expensive than jars or tubes. Can have a higher "throw-away" cost as some product remains in the mechanism.
Common Materials: Often made of PP, with a decorative outer sleeve.
A container paired with a lotion pump (a type of dispenser pump with a long dip tube).
Mechanism: User presses a pump head to draw product up through a dip tube.
Best For: Body lotions, hand creams, and liquidy serums.
Pros: Hygienic, easy to dispense with one hand, good for larger volumes.
Cons: Not suitable for very thick creams, as they can clog the pump. Requires "priming" on first use. Leaves product in the bottom.
Common Materials: PET, PP, HDPE.
A hybrid between a tube and a bottle, often standing upright.
Mechanism: The container is squeezed, and product dispenses through a small flip-top cap.
Best For: Face washes, serums, lighter creams.
Pros: Convenient and controlled, less messy than an open tube, stand-up design.
Cons: Similar to tubes, can be hard to control the squeeze and may "worm."




Contact Person: Mr. Jacky
Tel: 0086-15168562344